Damage evaluation in motor and personal accident claims is traditionally dependent on manual inspections. This process is often slow, subjective, and inconsistent, leading to delays in claim triage, inflated cost estimates, and fraud exposure. Insurers face challenges with claimant-provided photos that lack standardization, repeated claims for prior damage, and discrepancies with policy coverage. These inefficiencies increase settlement cycles, operational costs, and dispute risks.
The Damage Assessment Agent leverages computer vision to analyze claimant-uploaded photos or videos of damaged vehicles or property. It detects and classifies damage types—such as dents, scratches, or broken components—assesses severity, and estimates repair costs using OEM benchmarks and claims history data. The agent validates coverage, flags anomalies like staged or repeated damage, and generates structured assessment reports. By automating initial evaluations, it reduces dependence on human surveyors, speeds up triage, and ensures standardized, fraud-aware assessments.
Automates 80–90% of initial damage evaluations
Cuts manual inspection needs by up to 60%
Speeds claim triage and repair initiation by 40–55%
Achieves 95%+ accuracy in identifying standard damage types
Reduces minor claim settlement time by 30–35%
Improves consistency and fairness across assessments
Resources
The Damage Assessment Agent transforms how insurers assess damage by combining AI-powered image analysis with policy and cost benchmarks. It ensures objectivity, reduces fraud risk, and delivers standardized cost estimates for faster decision-making.
Automated Damage Detection: Identifies dents, cracks, scratches, and collision impact zones from images/videos
Severity Classification: Grades damage extent (minor, moderate, severe) for repair prioritization
Cost Estimation: Uses OEM part catalogs, labor rates, and regional benchmarks to calculate repair costs
Coverage Validation: Cross-checks detected damage with policy inclusions/exclusions
Fraud Pattern Detection: Flags reused images, prior damage, or staged claims for manual review
Duplicate Damage Check: Verifies against claim history to prevent repeated payouts
Structured Reporting: Auto-generates detailed reports linking damage, severity, and costs to claims systems
Adaptive Quality Control: Prompts claimants to re-upload blurry or poor-quality images
Historical Damage Datasets: Labeled images for training AI models.
OEM Parts Catalogs: Standardized part costs and repair rates.
Claims History Database: Prior claims and duplicate damage checks.
Policy Coverage Rules: Defines admissible damage types and exclusions.
AI Training Sets: Reference images for scratches, dents, and impact zones.
Image Quality Rule: Reject low-quality uploads; request new submission
Duplicate Damage Rule: Block claims for previously settled damage
Coverage Exclusion Rule: Flag wear & tear or non-covered damages
Fraud Detection Rule: Compare with known fraud markers (image reuse, staged scenes)
Cost Threshold Rule: Escalate if repair estimate exceeds policy-defined limits
Model Validation Rule: Cross-check vehicle/property metadata with uploaded images
Claimant submits photo/video via app, portal, or garage partner
Agent runs AI model to detect damage type and location
Classifies severity and links with repair benchmarks
Estimates cost using OEM data and regional rate tables
Validates policy coverage and exclusions
Flags anomalies or fraud indicators
Generates structured assessment report for claims processing
Passes output to downstream triage and settlement workflows
Badges
Classification